Bitmark Difficulty
Bitmark Difficulty Chart
Loading Bitmark difficulty chart...
The Bitmark difficulty chart plots a visual representation of the historical Bitmark difficulty target increases and decreases over time up to the current Bitmark block.
Current Bitmark Difficulty
The current BTM difficulty is 2.48 G at block 2,176,193, resulting in a Bitmark mining difficulty increase of 759.41% in the last 24 hours.
2.48 G
(2,475,838,765.59)
The Bitmark difficulty chart plots the Bitmark difficulty target over time and the current Bitmark difficulty (BTM diff) target. Including a historical data graph visualizing BTM mining difficulty chart values with Bitmark difficulty jumps and adjustments (both increases & decreases) defaulted to today with timeline options of 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and all time.
Bitmark Difficulty Increase
The BTM mining difficulty increase average in the last 24 hours is 759.41% at block 2,176,193 on the Bitmark blockchain network. In the last 7 days the Bitmark difficulty increase was 564.28%, with the increase in the last 30 days being 572.98%, and the last 90 days is 2,120.27%.
759.41%
1 Day
564.28%
7 Days
572.98%
30 Days
2,120.27%
90 Days
Last Bitmark block mined
Bitmark Difficulty Algorithm is Scrypt
The Bitmark difficulty data levels are calculated using the daily difficulty average data points in the Bitmark difficulty graph.
Bitmark Difficulty History for the Last 120 Days
| Date | Bitmark Difficulty Level |
|---|---|
| 07/02/2025 | 299,595,478.56859636 |
| 07/01/2025 | 288,084,817.05606501 |
| 06/30/2025 | 227,427,800.41252094 |
| 06/29/2025 | 168,667,225.33542643 |
| 06/28/2025 | 207,609,894.98678978 |
| 06/27/2025 | 274,312,805.60404728 |
| 06/26/2025 | 218,013,701.21238049 |
| 06/25/2025 | 372,710,154.80457112 |
| 06/24/2025 | 165,464,129.39812558 |
| 06/23/2025 | 227,855,648.28536383 |
| 06/22/2025 | 606,690,786.89627049 |
| 06/21/2025 | 470,685,599.40407127 |
| 06/20/2025 | 361,020,969.69168192 |
| 06/19/2025 | 172,307,766.79882024 |
| 06/18/2025 | 172,744,992.06642190 |
| 06/17/2025 | 98,342,472.79470907 |
| 06/16/2025 | 143,910,303.65656400 |
| 06/15/2025 | 98,961,618.63566249 |
| 06/14/2025 | 197,477,668.54503026 |
| 06/13/2025 | 85,700,573.21615129 |
| 06/12/2025 | 114,244,310.67205920 |
| 06/11/2025 | 98,928,600.54887375 |
| 06/10/2025 | 124,632,638.55878139 |
| 06/09/2025 | 113,078,222.84728087 |
| 06/08/2025 | 216,872,598.85758018 |
| 06/07/2025 | 134,319,103.89171964 |
| 06/06/2025 | 132,905,564.66504724 |
| 06/05/2025 | 157,046,075.16179380 |
| 06/04/2025 | 249,002,192.77118379 |
| 06/03/2025 | 487,326,308.81405277 |
| 06/02/2025 | 367,894,231.94085568 |
| 06/01/2025 | 138,744,927.57955345 |
| 05/31/2025 | 118,855,194.86958870 |
| 05/30/2025 | 158,588,181.49227122 |
| 05/29/2025 | 169,969,789.97210853 |
| 05/28/2025 | 197,464,798.01500426 |
| 05/27/2025 | 236,961,479.05629139 |
| 05/26/2025 | 253,696,660.94528657 |
| 05/25/2025 | 315,441,409.18445933 |
| 05/24/2025 | 309,889,783.96446648 |
| 05/23/2025 | 342,368,922.12722047 |
| 05/22/2025 | 232,924,748.60837345 |
| 05/21/2025 | 308,271,439.99666444 |
| 05/20/2025 | 240,309,731.47450332 |
| 05/19/2025 | 247,846,207.60103804 |
| 05/18/2025 | 198,195,036.43390236 |
| 05/17/2025 | 271,553,407.38456829 |
| 05/16/2025 | 292,620,328.82162668 |
| 05/15/2025 | 254,183,907.14734413 |
| 05/14/2025 | 311,216,701.23118579 |
| 05/13/2025 | 332,771,027.80568914 |
| 05/12/2025 | 349,294,308.38641892 |
| 05/11/2025 | 297,873,365.02109674 |
| 05/10/2025 | 235,465,265.56909463 |
| 05/09/2025 | 685,361,779.39685951 |
| 05/08/2025 | 1,285,163,277.83683509 |
| 05/07/2025 | 546,600,353.72477578 |
| 05/06/2025 | 415,025,151.78978365 |
| 05/05/2025 | 426,689,786.34875087 |
| 05/04/2025 | 263,910,368.28279655 |
| 05/03/2025 | 185,235,214.20770712 |
| 05/02/2025 | 336,526,803.91798205 |
| 05/01/2025 | 189,877,968.28565516 |
| 04/30/2025 | 184,306,621.83857992 |
| 04/29/2025 | 79,535,340.25832071 |
| 04/28/2025 | 103,381,992.13864953 |
| 04/27/2025 | 145,057,701.35507034 |
| 04/26/2025 | 97,854,657.25317130 |
| 04/25/2025 | 126,020,418.53948989 |
| 04/24/2025 | 160,139,778.43852340 |
| 04/23/2025 | 174,797,465.63046753 |
| 04/22/2025 | 216,917,812.99842765 |
| 04/21/2025 | 162,269,693.74279132 |
| 04/20/2025 | 127,154,796.17763379 |
| 04/19/2025 | 125,820,336.07746570 |
| 04/18/2025 | 153,120,913.92490924 |
| 04/17/2025 | 149,392,261.97499791 |
| 04/16/2025 | 110,030,837.83514802 |
| 04/15/2025 | 139,760,442.18123763 |
| 04/14/2025 | 112,619,415.53845867 |
| 04/13/2025 | 243,611,651.42157788 |
| 04/12/2025 | 160,157,110.92340306 |
| 04/11/2025 | 226,554,692.16314055 |
| 04/10/2025 | 137,006,657.97375968 |
| 04/09/2025 | 129,868,968.72298110 |
| 04/08/2025 | 146,966,376.22340483 |
| 04/07/2025 | 117,070,743.65483362 |
| 04/06/2025 | 108,604,242.87550307 |
| 04/05/2025 | 143,498,115.86104332 |
| 04/04/2025 | 145,336,792.93792219 |
| 04/03/2025 | 111,510,750.64439445 |
| 04/02/2025 | 154,358,674.26384040 |
| 04/01/2025 | 94,586,178.03562252 |
| 03/31/2025 | 119,085,818.63247378 |
| 03/30/2025 | 151,280,031.54517964 |
| 03/29/2025 | 113,805,877.17711572 |
| 03/28/2025 | 133,721,045.83158078 |
| 03/27/2025 | 122,244,950.98580314 |
| 03/26/2025 | 124,845,524.55703176 |
| 03/25/2025 | 93,511,663.42579953 |
| 03/24/2025 | 113,707,477.70216705 |
| 03/23/2025 | 126,933,794.65386458 |
| 03/22/2025 | 235,638,737.38918798 |
| 03/21/2025 | 170,436,204.09144071 |
| 03/20/2025 | 109,073,100.61045834 |
| 03/19/2025 | 181,981,827.07715180 |
| 03/18/2025 | 132,018,419.17797478 |
| 03/17/2025 | 139,315,413.42874037 |
| 03/16/2025 | 133,629,404.43527403 |
| 03/15/2025 | 194,776,725.61844918 |
| 03/14/2025 | 98,656,856.91457398 |
| 03/13/2025 | 154,998,107.25615803 |
| 03/12/2025 | 162,116,962.31085627 |
| 03/11/2025 | 241,937,253.14644540 |
| 03/10/2025 | 233,383,006.78608713 |
| 03/09/2025 | 190,505,232.10530618 |
| 03/08/2025 | 203,260,576.70680996 |
| 03/07/2025 | 145,165,224.01514286 |
| 03/06/2025 | 173,001,275.49716043 |
| 03/05/2025 | 397,814,353.27625662 |
| 03/04/2025 | 502,320,511.63793118 |
What is Bitmark difficulty?
Bitmark mining difficulty determines how difficult it will be to mine the next block and this is why it is referred to as the difficulty of Bitmark mining.
Bitmark difficulty is a measure of how many hashes (statistically) must be generated to find a valid solution to solve the next Bitmark block and earn the mining reward.
As you can see in the Bitmark difficulty chart above, the Bitmark Difficulty makes adjustments often.
Furthermore, the mining difficulty also keeps the block generation in line with the set block time, or the amount of time that should statistically pass between each block.
As more hashing power is added to the Bitmark mining network, the difficulty must increase to ensure blocks are not being generated too quickly.
In order for the blocks to be generated consistently, the difficulty must be increased or decreased, this is called a difficulty re-target.
On a difficulty re-target block (every block or every number of blocks), the difficulty is increased if the previous blocks where generated faster than the specified block time and decreased if the previous blocks where generated slower than the specified block time.
All that said, given a constant hashrate, when the BTM mining difficulty increases you earn less mining rewards due to the overall increase in the total Bitmark network hashrate.
Given, the frequent changes in Bitmark difficulty adjustments up and down, use our Bitmark mining calculator to calculate Bitmark mining profits.